Texas anti-ESG law declared unconstitutional by US judge

ReutersReuters

Texas anti-ESG law declared unconstitutional by US judge

By Jonathan Stempel

Thu, February 5, 2026 at 3:05 PM UTC

1 min read

Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google.

A drone view of a pump jack and drilling rig south of Midland, Texas, U.S. June 11, 2025. REUTERS/Eli Hartman

By Jonathan Stempel

Feb 5 (Reuters) - A federal judge declared unconstitutional a 2021 Texas law restricting state investments in companies seeking ​to rely less on fossil fuels or boycott that ‌industry.

In a decision made public on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Alan Albright said the ‌law violated First Amendment free speech protections because it punished businesses for speaking about fossil fuels and associating with organizations that oppose fossil fuels.

Advertisement

Advertisement

The Austin, Texas-based judge also called the law known as Senate Bill 13 "facially ⁠overbroad" and "unconstitutionally vague," saying ‌it invites and has already led to discriminatory enforcement.

"SB 13’s definition of 'boycott energy companies' permits the state to ‍penalize companies for all manner of protected expression concerning fossil fuels," wrote Albright, an appointee of U.S. President Donald Trump.

Texas is the largest U.S. oil-producing ​state, and the largest Republican-led state to crack down on businesses ‌whose environmental, social and governance (ESG) policies it opposes.

Senate Bill 13 was challenged by the American Sustainable Business Council, which said in an August 2024 lawsuit that the law illegally codified viewpoint-based discrimination that harms its more than 250,000 members.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and former ⁠Texas Comptroller Glenn Hegar were named ​as defendants. The offices of Paxton and ​of Hegar's acting successor Kelly Hancock did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday.

David Levine, president and ‍co-founder of the ⁠ASBC, in a statement called the decision a "massive win" for sustainable businesses and investors.

"The court has affirmed what we've always ⁠known: you cannot punish businesses for their investment decisions or silence those who speak ‌about climate risk," Levine said.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in ‌New York; Editing by Mark Porter)

Source